The Court emphasised that the Arbitral Tribunal is required to render a decision having regard to the terms of the agreement. It was held that in the present case, the award of damages on account of loss of profits was contrary to the terms of the agreement and thus the Award was held to be vitiated by patent illegality
Read MoreThe plea seeks a directive for the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to implement immediate measures to prevent similar incidents in the future
Read MoreThe bench, led by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and comprising Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, while passing the order, observed that the notification does not infringe upon the Constitution or show any disrespect towards it
Read MoreBench comprising Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri set aside the proceeding after previously granting an interim stay on Munjal's petition contesting the case
Read MoreThe court noted that the debarment directive, issued without a show cause notice or opportunity for the Petitioner to respond, prima facie violates natural justice principles
Read MoreThe High Court grants the permission after considering the recommendation by the medical board of AIIMS and physical- mental well-being of the petitioner woman
Read MoreArbitrator can add companies as parties basis GoC doctrine even during arbitration, the High Court held
Read MoreEndemol Shine India Limited was represented by Senior Advocate Dayan Krishnan and Advocate Harsh Kaushik instructed by ANM Global, Advocates and Legal Consultants team comprising of Purazar Fouzdar, Nidhish Mehrotra, Declan Fernandez, Deepank Singal and Mohit Bangwal
Read MoreThe bench of Justice Sanjeev Narula said the claims made by the petitioner appear to be designed to manipulate or mislead
Read MoreSaregama India Limited was represented by Mr Gopal Jain, Senior Advocate along with team of Khaitan & Co, led by Mr Ankur Sangal (Partner) and and Mr Shashwat Rakshit, Senior Associate
Read More