The Delhi High Court has issued an order safeguarding the personality rights of veteran journalist Rajat Sharma. Justice Amit Bansal restrained eight individuals and entities from misusing Sharma’s name, image, voice, or likeness through artificial intelligence or deepfake technology for personal or commercial purposes without his explicit written consent.
Read MoreThe Singe Judge of the Delhi High Court, in its judgment, by citing various landmark judgments upon the doctrine of forum conveniens, reiterated that a writ petition cannot be entertained merely because a fraction of the cause of action has arisen within the territorial jurisdiction of a particular High Court.
Read MoreThe initiatives aim to advance the vision set by the Information Technology, Artificial Intelligence & Accessibility Committee, chaired by Justice Rajiv Shakdher, and include Justice Sanjeev Narula, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, and Justice Girish Kathpalia
Read MoreJustice Vikas Mahajan said that the provisions of Section 15A (10) of the Act are mandatory and the present bail proceedings will have to be video recorded
Read MoreJustice Swarna Kanta Sharma of the Delhi High Court stated that since the university's seat allocation calculation had not been invalidated, St. Stephen's College must admit the petitioning students according to the allocation policy used in the previous academic year
Read MoreThe bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna reserved the order after hearing arguments from both sides
Read MoreIn February 2020, the Delhi High Court had stayed the proceedings in the defamation case against Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and other AAP leaders
Read MoreBench comprising Justice Sanjeev Narula heard and granted interim relief in a suit concerning the violation of Plaintiffs' intellectual property rights through the sale of pirated/ counterfeit books sold under the Plaintiffs' mark/ name "EASTERN BOOK COMP ANY" and "EBC"
Read MoreTejas Karia is a Partner with the Dispute Resolution Practice at Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas and also heads the Firm’s Arbitration Practice
Read MoreThe court observed that the prosecution did not claim that the applicant prepared the documents in question
Read More