Koda's plea states, "The elections in Jharkhand are expected to be conducted in November 2024, and the applicant, previously being the Chief Minister and returni MP, MLA on multiple occasions, would be deprived of the opportunity to contest these elections if the order of his conviction is not stayed."
Read More
Delhi HC's Bench led by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan while dismissing the plea also imposed costs of Rupees of one lakh on the petitioner and said “Do you think courts impose censorship under article 226? Are you asking for a gag order against the press? What do we do? Do we impose an emergency? Censorship? Martial law? How do we gag the press and political rivals?”
Read More
The bench of Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma fixed May 13 for al detailed hearing in the matter while allowing investigation agencies more time to file responses in the matter
Read More
The bench of Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora on May 2, sought responses from all respondents, including the Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, State (NCT of Delhi) through its Chief Secretary and Registrar General, Delhi High Court and fixed the matter for July 16
Read More
The bench of Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora said that it is not the domain of the courts to design the courses and that authorities concerned are continuously reviewing it
Read More
A bench, led by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan, and also comprising Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, asked the Election Commission to decide the representation by Monday, keeping in view the urgency of the matter
Read More
The principal issue at the heart of the batch of pleas was the failure of the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) to deregister aircraft despite the lessors' compliance with the stipulated deregistration procedures under the Aircraft Rules, 1937.
Read More_20240430094811original_image_27.webp)
Bench comprising Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri observed that the Petitioner had shown remorse for his conduct and undertook not to repeat the same in future and that both the parties had settled their disputes
Read More_20240428141347original_image_18.webp)
The bench also imposed cost of Rs 75,000 on the petitioner
Read More_20240427151533original_image_5.webp)
The bench also imposed cost of Rs 75,000 on the petitioner and ordered that the amount to be deposited with AIIMS-related funds
Read More
