The bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna has concluded the hearing after considering arguments from both Pathak's counsel and representatives of the Tihar authorities
Read MoreAfter hearing part arguments from both sides, Justice Neena Bansal Krishna has scheduled the case for further proceedings on Thursday
Read MoreThe Collegium comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justices Sanjiv Khanna and BR Gavai recommended advocates Ajay Digpaul, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, and Shwetasree Majumder
Read MoreThe petition under Article 226 challenged NHAI's decision dated April 10, 2024, blacklisting the Petitioner, Transys Consulting, for two years and imposing a financial penalty of INR 3.06 lakhs
Read MoreThe statement mentioned that the firm has taken legal action in this regard and appropriate Interim order has been passed by the Delhi High Court
Read MoreThe court while granting bail, noted that physical relations between the petitioner and prosecutrix continued for about two years before lodging the FIR
Read MoreFalcon Autotech was led by Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate, who was briefed by Subhash Bhutoria of LAW SB
Read MoreThe matter was mentioned on Tuesday before the bench led by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan, also comprising Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, by Advocate Rudra Vikram Singh for urgent listing of the matter. The bench noted the submissions and said if the requited papers are in order, the matter will be heard tomorrow
Read MoreThe bench, led by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and also comprising Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, is scheduled to hear the matter on Wednesday
Read MoreThe Court emphasised that the Arbitral Tribunal is required to render a decision having regard to the terms of the agreement. It was held that in the present case, the award of damages on account of loss of profits was contrary to the terms of the agreement and thus the Award was held to be vitiated by patent illegality
Read More