The instant Civil Appeals arose out of the Petitioner’s challenge to Calcutta High Court’s Impugned Judgement dated 03.06.2021 u/S 37 of A&C Act, 1996, where the High Court has set aside/modified the following amounts which were awarded by Arbitrator by Arbitral Award
Read MoreThe Collegium comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and Justices Sanjiv Khanna and BR Gavai recommended advocates Ajay Digpaul, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, and Shwetasree Majumder
Read MoreThe Supreme Court on Tuesday constituted a National Task Force (NTF) comprising senior doctors to formulate recommendations for ensuring the safety of medical professionals at their workplaces. The court was hearing matters related to the alleged rape and murder of a trainee doctor at R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata, after taking suo motu cognizance of the case. Meanwhile, state, Union territory, and central governments have been ordered to submit detailed reports on hospital security measures, including CCTVs, duty rooms, grief and crisis counselling systems, within a month
Read More24 of the 39 advocates designated as Senior Advocates are Advocates-on-Record
Read MoreThe top court was hearing Sisodia's appeal challenging the Delhi High Court order that dismissed his bail plea in the cases being probed by the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Enforcement Directorate
Read MoreA circular of the apex court said that screening of the movie is part of the activities organised during the 75th year of the establishment of the Supreme Court of India
Read MoreThis comment from the global credit rating followed the July 25 Supreme Court ruling that granted state governments the power to tax mineral resources and clarified that royalties paid by miners do not qualify as taxes
Read MoreA bench of Justices, Hima Kohli and Sandeep Mehta, said that they are of the opinion that the Ministry of Ayush must set up a dashboard mentioning complaints received from states and action taken on those complaints
Read MoreThe top court order came while closing petitions challenging the validity of the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils. The grievance of the petitioner was that the fees charged by the SBCs at the time of admission of persons on State rolls are more than the enrolment fee prescribed under Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act 1961
Read MoreAdditional Solicitor General SV Raju sought time on behalf of the Enforcement Directorate to file a reply. The court gave time to the Enforcement Directorate to file a reply until Thursday
Read More