The Supreme Court, upon hearing the arguments, noted that both the free certified copy and the certified copy obtained through payment are treated equally under law. The Court allowed the appeal and said that there should be no distinction between the two types of certified copies when it comes to the computation of limitation periods for filling appeals.
Read More
The Applicant, Resolution Professional was represented by Counsel Mr. Shyam Kapadia along with Advocate Ms. Shikha Ginodia and Advocate Mr. Gaurav Suryavanshi instructed by ANM Global
Read More
The judges of NCLAT informed the investors' counsel this that as an appellate court, they cannot intervene in matters that are "yet to mature" in NCLT
Read More
The companies (Viacom18, Digital18 and Star India) had proposed a Composite Scheme of Arrangement for Merger under Sections 230 and 232 of Companies Act 2013. Divison Bench comprising Anu Jagmohan Singh (Technical Member) and Justice Kishore Vemulapalli (Judicial Member) gave their approval to the scheme of the merger
Read More
Mr. Vaibhav Mahajan and Ms. Harshita Aggarwal represented the Appellant. The Resolution Professional was represented by Ms. Varsha Banerjee and Ms. Mahima Ahuja, and Respondent No.2, i.e., SRA was represented by Mr. Prithu Garg, partner at GnS Legal along with Mr. Parth Bhatia, and Mr. Shivam Singh, associates at GnS Legal
Read More
