Bench comprising Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice Augustine George Masih said that in the absence of any cogent evidence to show that the cheque was not issued in discharge of the debt, the presumption would hold good
Read MoreThe court refused to share the report with the counsel for the accused persons. Special judge MK Nagpal took the report on record.
Read MoreThe bench of Justice Subramonium Prasad after hearing the all sides, reserved the order and fixed the matter for February 23, 2024 for pronouncement
Read MoreThe Saraf and Partners team was led by Abir Lal Dey (Partner). Bikash Jhawar (Senior Partner) provided inputs on certain aspects of the transaction
Read MoreTrial Court's basic reasoning was that the whole prosecution case dependended upon the extra judicial confession of the accused and the fact that there was no eye witness in the case
Read MoreThe core team consisted of Vineet Shingal (Partner), Tanushree Bhuwalka (Partner), Devaditya Chakravarti (Principal Associate), Vedika Agarwal (Senior Associate), Shriya Kamat (Associate) and Shreeya Agrawal (Associate)
Read MoreJustice Amit Mahajan issued notice to the Delhi Police for its response and listed the matter for further hearing on March 1
Read MoreWhile granting bail to the accused, the Court noted that the charge sheet has been filed while accused was on interim bail for the purpose of his sister's marriage
Read MoreBench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra was told by senior advocate Kapil Sibal that the matter has been adjourned nine times
Read MoreWhile hearing an anticipatory bail application, bench comprising Justice Krishan Pahal also stated that mere pendency of the bail application could not accrue any right in favour of the applicant
Read More