Additional Sessions judge Devender Kumar Jangala dismissed the bail plea of Amit Agarwal considering the allegations against him. and his conduct
Read More
The bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna in an order passed on June 14, 2024, stated that "The irreparable loss and injury would be caused to the plaintiff/ Rajat Sharma if the videos and Tweets, etc as mentioned above, are allowed to be in the public domain, it would continue to cause harm to his reputation as a respectable Journalist which would cause irreparable harm to the plaintiff."
Read More
The bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna on Friday reserved the order on the interim application to restrain Congress leaders from making these allegations
Read More
The Plaintiff was represented by Counsel Mr Hiren Kamod who was instructed by Mr Nishad Nadkarni, Mr Aasif Navodia, Ms Khushboo Jhunjhunwala, Ms Jaanvi Chopra, Ms Rakshita Singh and Mr Prem Khullar
Read More_20240613143426_original_image_30.webp)
From claims of question paper leaks and the alleged distribution of incorrect question papers at certain exam centres, Advocate Dinesh Jotwani dissects the alleged NEET 2024 scam in an interview with Krishnendra Joshi, BW Legal World.
Read More (800 x 650 px) (1)_20240613214730_original_image_4.webp)
"Until disposal of the petition before the High Court, screening of the movie in question shall remain suspended", the bench said.
Read More
Special judge Hasan Anzar acquitted Harpreet Fashion Pvt. Ltd., Mohanjit Singh Mutneja, Gunjit Singh Mutneja, Harpreet Kaur Mutneja, Harmendra Singh, Raman Kumar Agarwal, Darwan Singh Mehta, TG Purshottam and CT Ramkumar. Four of the accused were bank employees
Read More
vacation bench of Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice Prasanna B Varale took strong objection to the Delhi government's failure to remove defects in its petition and deferred the hearing
Read More
A vacation bench of Justices Sanjay Kumar and Augustine George Masih refused to interfere with the Karnataka High Court order and said the former minister's case was not a fit one for quashing
Read More
The petition claims that the allocation of grace marks was arbitrary, noting that scores of 718 and 719 out of 720 achieved by several students are "statistically impossible."
Read More
