The dispute arose from a construction contract between Appellant and Respondent. The Respondent furnished Bank Guarantees (BGs) to secure its performance. Disputes arose, leading to arbitration
Read MoreJustice Chagla stated that, based on initial observations, CEAT owns the unique tread design of its CROSSDRIVE AT tyre, which has earned a good reputation. He added that the advertisement in question unfairly compared a worn-out CEAT tyre with a brand-new Apollo tyre, which seemed intended to demean and defame CEAT's CROSSDRIVE AT tyre
Read MoreThe core team consisted of Rabindra Jhunjhunwala (Partner), Roshnek Dhalla (Counsel), Sweta Rao (Principal Associate) and Prerna Hegde (Associate)
Read MoreThe man identified as Trilok Chand Chaudhary is an accused in a cheating and forgery case registered by the Economic Offence Wing (EoW, South) in the year 2022. The court on Wednesday directed the applicant, Trilok Chand Chaudhary, to surrender before the jail superintendent within one day
Read MoreThe order passed by a bench of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice Sanjiv Khanna and BR Gavai also rejected the pleas of telecom companies seeking a hearing in open court
Read MoreSpecial CBI judge Rakesh Syal has issued notice to the ED and sought a response. The court will hear the bail application on September 25. The court has listed the main case on October 5 for hearing
Read MoreThe core team consisted of Manisha Shroff, Rajshekhar Upadhyaya, Chirag Gohil, Nikunj Mehta, Ananya Bharadwaja, Jhanvi Shah, and Shubha Ojha with assistance from Moin Ladha on SEBI disclosures and Takeover Code aspects, Ritu Shaktawat on direct tax aspects
Read MoreThis initiative aims to address the need for alternative dispute resolution in India and will make high-quality training accessible nationwide. Initially, the pilot phase is open to judicial officers and experienced lawyers from September 23 to October 6, 2024. For more details, visit NALSA's mediation portal
Read MoreBench comprising Justice Hrishikesh Roy, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice SVN Bhatti observed that, "It would be a travesty of justice if the petitioner is unable to secure the benefit of bail order for his inability to furnish local surety. This will infringe the rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution for the person, who continues to be detained despite a bail order in his favour."
Read MoreJustice Sanjeev Narula allowed the couple to travel abroad after considering their plea
Read More